|
Do you like the new Rohan and Isengard minis? | Love them all | | 0% | [ 0 ] | I like most of them (only one or two I dislike) | | 88% | [ 7 ] | Eh, they're OK | | 0% | [ 0 ] | Don't like most of them, but there's one or two decent ones | | 0% | [ 0 ] | They're all horrible! | | 0% | [ 0 ] | New minis? :shock: | | 12% | [ 1 ] |
| Total Votes : 8 | | |
|
Author | Message |
---|
Dînadan MoMe Underlord
Main Army : Alkalabeth Posts : 1250 Reputation : 8 Age : 36 Location : South Wales Join date : 2009-09-02
| Subject: Rohan and Isengard Thu Feb 25, 2010 3:39 am | |
| So, what do people think of the new releases for Rohan and Isengard? |
|
| |
Red Corsairs MoMe Overlord
Main Army : Gondor Posts : 1162 Reputation : 15 Location : Market Deeping Join date : 2009-09-01
| Subject: Re: Rohan and Isengard Thu Feb 25, 2010 3:53 am | |
| I like most of them to be honest, especially the New Nazgul and Eomer! |
|
| |
Dînadan MoMe Underlord
Main Army : Alkalabeth Posts : 1250 Reputation : 8 Age : 36 Location : South Wales Join date : 2009-09-02
| Subject: Re: Rohan and Isengard Thu Feb 25, 2010 3:55 am | |
| I haven't seen the mini in the flesh other than in a blister with its back to me, but I don't like the new Saruman. Other than that I like all the new releases - almost gave into the temptation to buy Eomer or Thrydan the other day O.o |
|
| |
LordFenrir The Dog Lord
Main Army : Khand Posts : 443 Reputation : 16 Age : 35 Location : Bowling Green, Ohio, USA Join date : 2009-09-02
| Subject: Re: Rohan and Isengard Thu Feb 25, 2010 3:58 am | |
| The only one I really dislike is Saruman, since he bears no resemblance to the film's version of him...he looks too similar to Gandalf.
But the rest are very nice. I will absolutely be getting a Winged Nazgul, and may end up getting Thyrdan for a small Dunland army. |
|
| |
jaws900 Conqueror
Posts : 1215 Reputation : 4 Age : 35 Location : Poole - England Join date : 2009-09-02
| Subject: Re: Rohan and Isengard Thu Feb 25, 2010 7:07 am | |
| i'm ok with Saruman but i dislike Eomer. Just me but ik'd rather use a Son of Eorl for him. As for in the flesh i have seen the Nazgul.
And it's still awsume but i am worryed about the "ball socket" connecting it with it's bace as it seems a little too "frigle" |
|
| |
LordFenrir The Dog Lord
Main Army : Khand Posts : 443 Reputation : 16 Age : 35 Location : Bowling Green, Ohio, USA Join date : 2009-09-02
| Subject: Re: Rohan and Isengard Thu Feb 25, 2010 7:16 am | |
| What I'd do is use the ball socket to position him how I want him and then glue him in that position. Sure, he'd be a bugger to transport, but just carry him in your hand, or get a shoebox filled with packing peanuts...it'll do the trick. |
|
| |
jaws900 Conqueror
Posts : 1215 Reputation : 4 Age : 35 Location : Poole - England Join date : 2009-09-02
| Subject: Re: Rohan and Isengard Thu Feb 25, 2010 7:24 am | |
| i have to do that all ready with my Balrog...and he's only got 1 arm since that whip is really top heavy (resists "i suppose he's armless them" joke....dam!) |
|
| |
Cal585 Maiar
Main Army : Gondor Posts : 395 Reputation : 7 Age : 33 Location : Terra Australis Join date : 2009-09-07
| Subject: Re: Rohan and Isengard Fri Feb 26, 2010 12:10 pm | |
| Heh, seems we're all in a similar frame of mind. I quite like the new releases, the Nazgul particularly. There's just something about Saruman though, maybe the extremely long sleeve, that doesn't make me take immediately to him. But the others are good. But am I the only one not liking the way the new banners are being made? They just seem more cartoonish compared to the older ones... |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Rohan and Isengard | |
| |
|
| |
|